Donna Said:

Why hasn't this received any play in the current US presidential election?

We Answered:

because libs control the media. they won't be able to hide the truth when prices spiral out of control and there is no food.

Herman Said:

What analogy would you use to describe the current presidential election?

We Answered:

spy vs spy

Nicole Said:

Anyone outside the USA; you opinion on our current Presidential Election?

We Answered:

This is Y/A

Get real..................................
The Clinton's are under handed and sneaky
Just ask yourself this...................

"Primary Colors" go see it or rent it.
It explains how the Clinton's operate.
Ask yourself this, for real.............................
Rev Wright the Man of the Cloth.
Why is religious Wright committing black on black back stabbing? Right when his book is to emerge?
His book is due out, conveniently just before the election

Today a guy was trying to ask Dan Abrams about the
Clintons. He wouldn't let him talk.

Clinton's had someone go to Wright and had him paid off.
The FBI told Wright that his life was being threatened.
This is when the Clinton's, had someone that paid someone else, that paid someone else, that offered Wright a book deal and to
mention the Clinton's for an extra $500mil each time

Terrence Said:

how does the current presidential election relate to the declaration of independence?

We Answered:

The Declaration of Independence is a fascinating document. You might want to consider reading it before asking for help on Y!A.

Leon Said:

What does Edwards affair have to do with the current presidential election?

We Answered:

Logically,nothing.

The neoconservatives are trying to use it to stereotype "Democrats" and hence Obama, as "immoral."

A standard tactic they've been using for years.

In this case, not to bright. Consider: Edwards behaved like a piece of trash--cheating on his sick wife There's no getting around that, even though he did end it some time ago.

But what about the presidential candidates?
Obama is married. Never divorced. No hint of any infidelity.
McCAin on the other hand, sunk even lower than Edwards. McCain didn't just cheat on his sick wife, he divorced her to marry the tr**p he was committing adultery with.

If the neoconsaare smart, they'll STFU. People who live in glass houses, and all that.

Reginald Said:

How has class, race and gender been used in the current Presidential Election?

We Answered:

Both parties have used all of the above to evade real issues.The loss of civil liberities and an economy that is dead,and awaiting total control by private elitist bankers within 4 months,or less.Everyone knows this race has been about electing a minority of one kind or another.The public perception is controlled by a Leftist media,or both candidates would be out of the runnning.The parties are a hegelian dialectic to give sheeple the false notion that they have a choice.The 3rd party candidates are not allowed in debates or covered seriously by the msm.

Don Said:

Ethical Issues of concern in the current presidential election?

We Answered:

I'm not sure that "ethical" is the word you are looking for regarding those issues.

It is not ethical to deny anyone health care, and this nation doesn't. I have no health insurance by choice and want to keep it that way because 1 - we don't use MDs so health insurance is useless to us 2 - health insurance is the cause of the current health care pricing crisis - 3rd party payers = no accountability. http://www.marketmed.org/history.asp The gov't as 3rd party won't make a difference. Neither of those are "ethical" concerns though. They are "economic" concerns.

Same with environment and labor. Labor is a labor concern, and so long as people are being treated fairly by employers I'm fine with that. The time of the labor union is dead and that is a labor concern, not an ethical concern.

The environment is a scientific concern, how to maintain and sustain it. It is ethical if people are knowingly and willfully damaging the environment, but I don't believe that the case any more than I believe in global warming (which I have thoroughly researched). It is good and proper to do what is right for the environment as individuals, but mandating that at a government level doesn't make an "ethical" thing. It just makes more mistakes, like forcing mercury laced light bulbs on a population that is already mercury poisoned from vaccinations, industrial complexes and coal fired generation plants.

Ethical concerns are abortion - which is murder and unethical in my opinion. But not necessarily something to be fought in government chambers beyond the pronouncement that murder is illegal. Gay marriage is an ethical concern, and not to be mandated by government in my opinion. Ethical concerns are concerns brought about by a persons morality and faith. Ethics in government is the proper application of the golden rule. While I agree basic law is set in ethics and morality, nit picking ethics by legislation is what grows gargantuan government that can no longer be sustained or supported. Micromanagement of people's lives is unethical, and not the job of our government. In my opinion neither is the education of our children, the stealing of my money, or the decision of what I will or won't see on the airwaves I tune into.

Now election reform - that is a good example of appropriate ethics attention in government. Our current system makes elections a bought and paid for thing, not a people's choice. The best candidate is probably sitting in Ashland, Tennessee too broke to run.