Cindy Said:

Why do many people talk about the next Congressional election like it is not ...?

We Answered:

Great Link!! I know mine and out goes any liberal far left mind thinkers!!
I will pass this along!

Virgil Said:

Will "Operation Chaos" successfully destroy another presidential election for the Democrats?

We Answered:

Sure will. If these two candidates keep up the petty fighting then sure enough there will be plenty voters for McCain this fall. What an implosion.

Monica Said:

Is Barak Obaba a viable Presidential candidate? What advise and concerns should Obama address?

We Answered:

I think the key is that Bush trashing has "legs" - whichever party that can spin that the best will win, but either a minority or a woman must be on the ticket as that is anti-establishment as well. I personally would have a hard time deciding between McCain/Giuliani, Giuliani/McCain, Giuliani/Rice or McCain/Rice.

On the Democratic side Obama has the most anti-Bush "legs" but the feeling for him fades in the heartland. So Clinton/Obama (and this time the prez/veep order must be maintained, not for political correctness but so Hillary's toes do not get stepped on) would to me be the most formidable ticket for Democrats.

It's going to be very interesting and unless there is a severe act of War on Iran's part you should expect to see Hillary as our next President with Obama as Veep, but by about the same margin as in the last election as this country (as if you hadn't noticed) is getting about as polarized as it was right before the War Between the States, so there will be no landslides for the forseeable future, but definitely a Democratic Legistative bias for at least the next five years.

As far as what issues Obama should address, he has to come off as a healer of this great divide forming in our country as well as a person willing to moderate and compromise; he cannot come off as "everyone, if they were smart enough, would realize they should be a Democrat because all Dems are good while even a blind man could see that all Republicans are evil" - that stuff is passe and any such imflammatory rhetoric could only add to the momentum that is building today towards a new Civil War.

Next he has to mention the economy and must make a watershed announcement that some aspect of the Welfare system needs to be overhauled - what better way to start the change than to have the party (Roosevelt's) that started this Big Brother concept to admit that it somehow, as well-intentioned as it was, took a slighly wrong approach and must change tactics to better "promote the general welfare", and in so doing he must address spousal abuse, medical insurance and gangs, and propose better ways to get a handle on such things.

Then he must mention that, as distasteful as the War in Iraq has been (all could agree on that), that the concept of "providing for the common defense" must always be at the heart of our purpose of having a Government in the first place and he must not shrink from the duty of a War with Iran if necessary.

Then he must stop taking as an insult the fact that he has been labeled "eloquent" as a racial slur. As for me I always prefer eloquence to poor grammatical standards. He needs to imagine than nobody can see the color of his skin when they hear him talk (or even care about it as is my own tendency).

Then he must mention that the jury is still not out on Global Warming - that 50% of the professional scientists, although they are obviously aware that polar caps have been melting at an alarming rate, are still not convinced that it is solely the work of Man rather than being caused by nature and merely exaggerated by man - indeed, some still are not willing to conclude that man is indeed exacerbating it - after all, by scientific analysis of the ice layers in Antarctica it can be established that previous global warming has occurred in the past - so it would be a stretch to assume that each and every one of these previous Ice cap meltings were cause solely by man, who vanished and reappeared each time with perhaps a 2-3% remnant population base that learned absolutely nothing about its previous wrong behavior.

Then he must tackle Immigration - and must mention that, although he thinks Bush's policies have been misguided, he must make a real solution to the problem that is good enough to garner him the Nobel prize and not play into the hands of the radical Mexican protesters or the Ku Klux Klan.

Finally, he needs to say that although the ways of Washington must change in general, he must not make it a threat to throw the baby out with the bathwater - he must preserve those institutions he feels are working, and he must solicit the opinions of those across the aisle to help him fix what he perceives to be wrong.

He must also be gracious if the Dems draft Hillary as President with him Vice-President, and must not be angry that he was not nominated in her place; after all, wouldn't you rather have your party elected than ego gratification?

In short - he has a tall order.