Kelly Said:

Will there be another civil war in America, the Liberals vs the Conservatives?

We Answered:

Liberals would win. We have more vets, we have more currently enlisted and we do have a knowledge of guns believe it or not. I'm very liberal and have tons of guns in my house. Liberals are smarter, we all have college degrees and we have the world at our backs. We have all the allies and we have all the brain and we have all the guns. We'd win. It'd never happen though so this is a silly thing to argue about.

-Bill

Lena Said:

liberals vs conservatives which one is better for america hello from spain?

We Answered:

That didn't work. Your question is flagged as originating in the US.

Neither "liberal" nor "conservative" has any real meaning anymore. But bs is forever. ?°)

Roland Said:

Cyber-security and Privacy Rights: Liberals vs. Conservatives?

We Answered:

One conservative point of view.
(Feb. 4, 2010) I see where Goolge is 'voluntarily' joining forces with the NSA on some level; with some undisclosed 'preventative' measures of gleaning Google's data base for nefarious activity.
I drafted this short piece on 8-28-'09:
------------------
The boa constrictor continues

The digital age is a Boa Constrictor for personal rights, privacy, and freedom of speech.
Currently, all major Internet service providers (Google, Yahoo, Charter, et al) utilize some form of 'personalized marketing' which they claim is to 'improve your experience' (or similar bull plop). These 'enhanced' methods utilize 'Phorm' inspired data siphon techniques to spy on everyone's behavior, with the corporate eye on the new God: the Shekel.
It is only a matter of time before the world governments say "Hey, we can use this data base for things other than what they were intended..." and complete, unrestricted access to personal history is now in the hands of a elite group of self appointed morality cops, modeling their control structure as does the Taliban.
Many of these "mass mind control" concepts had been used for hundreds of years, but until technology had entered the "up close and personal" era, the truly complete, willingly submitted to theology was not possible without an event to spawn mass empathy with this concept.
9-11 provided exactly what was needed, convincing everyone that it's "for our own good".

And everyday the constrictor tightens, inch by imperceptible inch.

Google surrenders info @ government order (8-19-'09)
http://www.blogherald.com/2009/01/06/mod…
Courts have ordered a bloggers identity to be revealed...one more step to complete access to all records.

Caroline Said:

Liberals vs Conservatives on Circumcision?

We Answered:

I presume, judging on other people's comments, that liberals and conservatives are some kind of political parties somewhere or another. If that is the case, then I cant possibly answer the question.

However, if there is another meaning:
Liberal = freedom, laissez-faire, avant-garde
Conservative = carefulness, preservation, rational
then I would have to be on the side of conservatism. Preserving the foreskin is paramount to the normality of human life as we know it.

What you need to know about circumcision is that is it a terrible mutilation of the human body. No civilised person could ever allow this to happen to themselves or to someone they claim to love. Circumcision is the removal of the (male) foreskin. Uncut or uncircumcised refer to the natural state of the penis where the whole of the sexual organs are intact. About 90% of the males on Earth are not circumcised, but it is still practiced as a routine in Israel and in the USA.

Circumcision of a boy is as painful as circumcision of a girl - that means cutting of the clitoris and labia of a girl! I cannot imagine why anyone would want to inflict significant injury and permanent damage on a child or any other human. It is as good to be circumcised as it is to cut off your eyelid so your eye no longer has the protection and lubrication it was designed to have. A male was born with a foreskin for a reason, and it was not so it could be cut off!

Circumcised penises are no cleaner than a natural one - any one who says so obviously has no idea what they are talking about. It is said "World Health Organization and the Center [American spelling] of Disease Control want all males circumcised", but that is not true. The benefits of a foreskin far outweigh the benefits of circumcision. Only a fool would want to inflict such terrible carnage on another human. WHO and CDC do support circumcision, but only because American doctors and pharmaceutical companies make huge dollars out of the cruel process. They are willing to sacrifice human health and wellbeing on the altar of monetary greed.

Circumcision of the penis does not prevent cancers, HIV, spread of AIDS or any of the myriad of other things that seem to be attributed to it. Circumcision of the male is just as barbaric and cruel as circumcision of the female. Most people would not even consider inflicting such damage on a girl, yet some still consider it an acceptable practice to perform on a boy.

Contrary to what some others have said, almost 90% of the world male population is natural and is not circumcised.

Fernando Said:

What does this say about Liberals vs. Conservatives?

We Answered:

It says that you have a biased view not based on reality. These things happen on both sides all the time