Chester Said:

Obama 2008: is obama 08 an "freak accident of history" Jimmy carter 1976 obama 2008? 2010 Now?

We Answered:

Yes obama 08 is a "freak accident of history" Jimmy carter 1976 -- Yes Jimmy carter 1976 "freak accident of history". Regarding 0bama, six in 10 voters say they have "just some" or no confidence in President Obama to make the right decisions for the country.

America -- or at least the part of it that voted for Barack Obama for president -- has made a big mistake. Some of those teary-eyed people in Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood on Election Night 2008 would probably admit it if they were interviewed.

There is no shame in making a mistake. Everybody makes plenty in a lifetime, even in elections. Politicians are good at sounding good. The minority party promises to be more honest and ethical than the majority and then when it has gained the trust of people fed up with too much dishonesty and too little ethics, it becomes like the party it replaced.

The mistake made by those who voted for Obama, thinking it would be different with him, is their belief that it would be different with him. A politician is a politician. You could change the color, the gender, even the party, and you are still left with a politician. That is not necessarily an evil thing. We must have politicians, I suppose, but like the metaphorical crazy aunt who is kept in the attic, a politician should be kept in his or her place, lest the house become chaotic. o_O

Kevin Said:

Will this go to court in 2010?

We Answered:

if it does, it will include cached screen shots of her doing exactly what she denies having done..
telling supporters to contact the judge.
I personally have seen those. She is lying under sworn affidavit.
Yes, that is completely a violation of Professional ethics for any attorney.
I won't bother trying to debate the falsity of the other statements.

edit
I recognize that you DON'T agree with what I say... but I will continue to speak (respectfully)...
It is a scam, and Taitz is completely ignorant of all legal procedures. This "statement" is one more example of that ... the case IS DISMISSED. Closed. And she tries to worm in a statement, that has absolutely no legal basis, nor does it have any relevance to the core legal questions which she tried to impose.
Judge Carter HAS NO AUTHORITY or jurisdiction to make any ruling on if a President is or was eligible. ALL cases have to play by legal rules, which this one does not. It is the same with the case in Georgia, where she defied a direct ruling by Land, to CEASE filing, and she did not do so.
As for "defamatory".. nothing filed in the context of a lawsuit is defamatory, or subject to slander. It is protected from civil slander issues. On the other hand.. what she posts on a website, OUTSIDE OF AN OPEN LAWSUIT may not fit that.

nor does she have "evidence of" anyone being guilty. Guilty is a legal judgement, which has not been made by any authority. She has ALLEGATIONS (and laughable ones at that).. which she can turn over to an agency with authority to investigate.
Suggestion...STEP BACK and evaluate the words, which do nothing more than play on emotion of persons, who want to believe them to be true. WITHOUT EMOTION, you would be far more able to pick up on the complete lunacy of what is put out here.

Grace Said:

How much postage to put on my GA 2010 absentee ballot?

We Answered:

To be on the safe side, put more than usual.

If I were you, I'd put $2.20 worth on it. That's only 5 stamps.

A small price to pay to make sure that your vote is counted, wouldn't you say?

Cody Said:

Why are 6 Republican Senators and 18 Republican Reps. Retiring?

We Answered:

More lucrative deals as lobbyist and or special interest groups. On the other hand; perhaps they are just as dejected politically at the spiraling political bantering; yet nothing is being accomplished out of the mess, but division and hatred stream rolling forward.