Ruby Said:

Do liberal atheists really get together and plan to destroy families?

We Answered:

Not to mention: liberals are much more likely to have marriages where anything goes, from goats to gerbils. So why divorce when you lie in such a farce?

Ah, so that's the secret of a good marriage.

Gladys Said:

2010 Liberals lose all their seats to Conservatives or Republicans what is going to happen then?

We Answered:

If we elect the right candidates in 2010 there can still be changes made to the health care bill, or at least enough blocks to implementation to keep it from going into effect thereby stalling it until we can get some more people in 2012 to form a majority in which it can be repealed.
But basically it is going to be up to us to get candidates with enough courage and conviction to do so.

Herman Said:

The official 2010 midterm liberal campaigning has started. ARE LIBERALS this easy to spin?

We Answered:

As long as they continue to get their food stamps and unimpeded border crossings, they will vote OBAMA

Clifton Said:

The accusation of racism is done by those losing the debate; it's the last refuge of a liberal scoundrel?

We Answered:

It is not necessarily racist. The whining that one is being called racist for opposing the president, when racism is rarely if ever charged for opposing the president per say, is a last refuge sort of argument though.

Dale Said:

Why do liberal policies have a much higher return rate on every dollar invested?

We Answered:

Because liberals use their brains, and cons use their bile ducts.

Sandra Said:

Does the moral bankruptcy of liberal ideology lead directly to the economic bankruptcy of states and nations?

We Answered:

And as long as we have progressives in office we will all suffer economically as well as physically, and mentally. For instance if/when they do not continue with the Bush tax cuts, those making $40,000/yr with a family of four, will see they are paying $1600.00 in taxes to the government instead of getting a refund of the same.

*Consistent with the broadly destructive effects of its social philosophy, modern liberalism has had significant success in undermining the foundations of the traditional family despite the fact that its concept of society is modeled on the family. These effects have resulted from the agenda’s legislative initiatives and from its persistent invitations to relax the constraints of conscience. The middle and later years of the twentieth century, in particular, witnessed the agenda’s advocacy of alternative life styles, sexual permissiveness, drug abuse, easy divorce and dissolution of the family; its promotion of personal gratification at the expense of personal responsibility; its contempt for religion and traditional moral codes; its support for tax codes favoring single parent families and penalizing marriage; and the institution of welfare programs fostering wide spread economic, social and political dependency. These policies seriously undermined the foundations of American society. They were especially devastating to the family, and most notably to black families, which had managed to remain largely intact through the first half of the century despite the effects of continuing prejudice. These efforts to redesign the terms of human relatedness at individual, family and society levels continue in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, although a succession of defeats in federal and state elections in these years have led liberal politicians to mute their customary socialist message. This tactical change has not altered the basic liberal strategy, however, which remains that of infantilizing the population, collectivizing the major dimensions of social intercourse, and bringing them under the ever increasing control of the state.*

MR